top of page
SaaS Revenue

Reframed Legacy Hybrid Contracts as Pure SaaS Revenue Under ASC 606

And Made It Stick With the Buyer’s Accountants.

INDUSTRY

Vertical SaaS Platform

REVENUE

$15-50M Run Rate

ENGAGEMENT

Self-Slide CFO + Transaction Support

TEAM SIZE

Founder-Owned

The Situation

The company was preparing for a sell-side process. The new platform contracts read clearly as SaaS. The historical contracts didn’t — they bundled recurring data capture with software access in a way that left the revenue characterization ambiguous. On SaaS multiples vs. services multiples, the difference would be measured in real money.

A Big-4-adjacent firm was running the Q of E. ARR composition, EBITDA, and how recurring revenue got classified would drive the entire valuation conversation.

What CEI did

  • Wrote the ASC 606 position memo arguing platform access plus required data refresh as a single bundled performance obligation, recognized ratably over the contract term. Anchored the argument in ASC 606-10-25-19 through 25-21.


  • Built the technical case: data capture has no standalone customer utility outside the platform, no usable deliverable exists outside the system, and contracts contractually require periodic refresh — making it indistinguishable from a SaaS commitment in substance.


  • Reclassified all historical contract revenue in the adjusted model on substance-over-form grounds. Only true one-off, optional professional services remained classified as project revenue.


  • Defended each adjustment with the buyer’s ASC 606 specialists through three rounds of diligence questions and one round of report revisions. Pre-built the technical objections and the responses to each.

100%

Recurring Revenue Classified as SaaS

Zero

Adjustments rejected in Diligence

Clean

Revenue Quality Outcome

The Q of E presented the business as a SaaS platform company with embedded recurring services — not a project-driven consultancy. ARR ran clean to the full recurring revenue base. The buyer’s accountants pressure-tested the position and accepted it without forcing a downgrade in revenue classification.

In Their Words

“Anyone can argue a number. CEI built the technical case, wrote it down, and stood behind it when the buyer’s accountants pushed back. That is the difference between a clean diligence and a discount.”

— CEO | Confidential Client

Want a Conversation?

These are the situations CEI shows up in. If any of them rhyme with where you are, the right next step is a 20-minute conversation. We will tell you straight whether CEI is the right fit.

Josh Campbell  CEO, CEI Consulting Group

CONTACT
ADDRESS
SOCIALS

Email: info@ceiconsulting.com
Phone: 888.920.1505

CEI Consulting

875 N High Street, Suite 454 Columbus, OH 43025

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

© 2035 by CEI CONSULTING GROUP.  Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page